What Is the Purpose of the Davis-Bacon Act? A Complete Overview

What Is the Davis-Bacon Act and Why Does It Exist?

One of the key elements to understanding what it takes to work on federal construction projects is understanding the Davis-Bacon Act (DBA).

In 1931, the DBA was created to protect local workers by requiring contractors to pay at least the minimum prevailing wage and fringe benefits. The DBA helps federal construction projects support local communities and prevents undercutting regional labor standards. 

Created in the aftermath of the Great Depression, the act changed the focus from who could pay the least to who could build the best. It helped eliminate exploitation and championed a skilled, stable workforce capable of leveraging public works projects as a foundation for local economic growth.

What Is the Purpose of the Davis-Bacon Act?

The human element is at the core of the DBA. It helps local contractors compete fairly on federal construction projects and ensures these local workers are not undercut by outside firms looking to bring in underpaid laborers. In addition, the DBA helps ensure local workers understand their own impact on the community’s long-term success. 

The act also extends a level of protection to a community’s taxpayers. By investing in skilled laborers who receive a fair, living wage, community members are also investing in the improved quality and safety of bridges, federal buildings, and public infrastructure. 

Ultimately, this approach to fair pay for skilled workers results in a reduction of hidden costs that come in the form of future repairs and safety failures.

Why the Davis-Bacon Act Is Important for Workers and Contractors

Understanding why the Davis-Bacon Act is important means recognizing that individuals working on federal construction projects aren’t just working a job–they are working on their careers.

The DBA positions federal construction as a viable career path for individuals. For contractors, it helps eliminate the stress of being underbid by operations working with underpaid crews, and allows them to focus more on innovation and project efficiency. 

Ultimately, the DBA standardizes the most variable cost of any bid: labor. By setting this floor and ensuring workers are paid at minimum the local prevailing wage, the bidding process rewards the best-managed firms rather than the ones most willing to sacrifice worker well-being. 

The DBA lends itself to a strategic framework that promotes a healthier, more competitive industry landscape for everyone involved.

How Davis-Bacon Act Wages Are Determined

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) determines DBA wages by identifying the prevailing rates in a specific locality, covering both hourly pay and fringe benefits that provide workers with long-term security.

With the 2023 updates stemming from the Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR)—the most significant overhaul in 40 years—the DOL has modernized how these rates are calculated to better reflect the modern economy. 

While the updates help ensure accuracy, contractors must still be vigilant; if the proper rates are not physically in a contract, they face strong penalties. 

Who the Davis-Bacon Act Protects

With the DBA providing a blueprint for ensuring skilled laborers work on federal construction projects, which ultimately benefit the community, laborers and mechanics receive the most benefits. 

That is why it is important to distinguish who the DBA protects. This is where it is important to understand the line between professional staff and manual laborers, which can be broken down as follows:

  • Covered Workers: Skilled tradespeople (electricians, masons, operators), apprentices registered in approved programs, and supervisors who spend more than 20% of their time performing manual work.
  • Exempt Workers: Administrative, executive, or professional staff such as architects, engineers, timekeepers, and office clerks. Employees of material suppliers who only deliver materials to the site and do not perform construction work.

When Davis-Bacon Requirements Apply to Federal Projects

The DBA applies specifically to direct federal contracts exceeding $2,000 for the construction, alteration, or repair (including painting and decorating) of public buildings or public works.

The act applies to direct federal contracts over $2,000, but with the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA), the reach is far wider. 

From federal grants to modern initiatives like the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, prevailing wage standards have become a standard fixture of funded projects. Odds are – if your project involves federal funds, Davis-Bacon impacts will be felt. 

How the Act Helps Prevent Wage Undercutting

By removing labor costs as a bargaining chip, the DBA prevents price wars and undercutting costs, which would otherwise destabilize regional labor markets. 

It forces contractors to win on their merits—technical expertise and project management—ensuring that federal spending strengthens rather than erodes the economic base of communities.

Compliance Rules Contractors Need to Follow

For a modern contractor, labor compliance can be a relentless administrative hurdle. From strict rules to overwhelming paperwork, every detail must be perfect to avoid costly delays or penalties. Those details include:

  1. Weekly Certified Payroll: For every week work is performed, contractors must submit weekly payroll reports (CPRs) accompanied by a Statement of Compliance.
  2. Fringe Benefit Accountability: The 2023 DBA update codified the annualization process for calculating fringe benefit credits. Fringe benefits must be paid no less than quarterly and paid into a bona fide plan or via cash. 
  3. Site Postings: The WH-1321 Employee Rights poster  and applicable wage determination must be prominently displayed at the project site.
  4. Record Keeping: To justify worker classifications and exemptions, contractors must maintain detailed records, including job descriptions and daily logs.

Common Misunderstandings About Davis-Bacon Wages

As many firms can attest to, misunderstanding DBA rules is one of the biggest risks a firm can face. Whether it’s failing to track the 20% rule for working foremen or navigating new rules about fabrication shops, even honest mistakes can lead to significant financial and reputational damage.

  • The Supervisor Exemption: A common error is failing to track the 20% rule. If a foreman performs manual work for more than 20% of their weekly hours, they must be paid the prevailing wage for that manual labor time.
  • Site of Work: While exemptions traditionally applied to off-site work, 2023 updates and state-level Little Davis-Bacon Acts have expanded coverage to include some off-site activities, such as certain fabrication shops dedicated to a specific project.
  • Equipment Installation: If grant funds are used to purchase equipment, and that installation requires construction work (not just simple IT support), the entire project may trigger DBRA compliance.

How Software Tools Help Manage Davis-Bacon Act Compliance

With civil penalties reaching more than $13,000 per worker per pay period, manual tracking is simply too risky. 

This is where B2Gnow’s eComply prevailing wage labor compliance solution steps in as the strategic answer to your compliance headaches. Much like how B2Gnow simplifies the complex world of DBE/MBE/SBE certifications, these tools transform the burden of Davis-Bacon management into a streamlined, automated workflow.

These solutions eliminate the manual data entry and guesswork that lead to errors. By centralizing CPRs and site documentation, contractors and agencies can relax knowing projects are protected by a unified, intelligent system.

  • Automate daily logs and compare them against payroll before submission to prevent discrepancies.
  • Utilize Single Sign-On (SSO) to share contract and project information across modules seamlessly.
  • Perform on-site employee interviews and use geolocation details to validate that workers are being paid according to their actual classifications.

By automating the complex functions—from daily log comparisons to geolocation-validated interviews—B2Gnow ensures your organization is always audit-ready.

The Impact of the Davis-Bacon Act on Today’s Construction Industry

In the era of massive infrastructure investment—such as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Inflation Reduction Act—the Davis-Bacon Act is more relevant than ever. 

With billions of dollars in new federal spending and skilled labor being in high demand, fair compensation in the modern workforce is not just needed, but expected. 

Have more questions about the Davis-Bacon Act? Tune in to this on-demand webinar and learn more.

Understanding Prevailing Wage Labor Compliance 101

Prevailing wage labor compliance has multiple layers of complexity, but understanding how to navigate these layers doesn’t have to be difficult. But to better understand prevailing wage labor compliance, it’s important to first understand what it is and what it is not. 

What is Prevailing Wage vs. Minimum Wage?

When working on a government-funded or government-assisted construction project, all workers are paid the local prevailing wage. The prevailing wage is made up of two components: The base hourly rate and the fringe benefits, which includes health benefits and pensions. 

Many times, individuals can get confused over the terms prevailing wage and minimum wage. To help differentiate between the two, it is important to know minimum wage is the lowest hourly rate allowed by law for any worker and the prevailing wage is generally a higher trade-specific rate mandated on funded projects. 

As of 2026, minimum wage is $7.25 per hour and the prevailing wage can be between $50 to $100 per hour depending on location and other factors. 

Another wage question that comes up in the conversation about prevailing wage surrounds union wages. These rates are negotiated via a collective bargaining agreement between the union and employers, and it only applies to members of that union. 

The main difference can also be thought of as this: The government mandates minimum wage and prevailing wage, while union wages are contractual agreements between two parties. 

Key Prevailing Wage Laws Explained

The federal Davis-Bacon Act (DBA) of 1931 ensures prevailing wage rates are in effect and utilized on government projects. The DBA was started to protect workers in local communities against workers from other communities coming in and underbidding jobs of more than $2,000. 

With DBA regulations, local businesses benefit from the government-funded contract work and funds stay in the community. 

While the DBA protects wages at the federal level, the McNamara O’Hara Service Contract Act and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act offer further protections. 

The McNamara O’Hara Service Contract Act expands DBA coverage to services on government projects (not just construction) and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act covers overtime, which is not in the federal DBA. 

Additionally, many states have prevailing wage laws known as Little Davis Bacon Acts or State Bacon Acts, which can add on requirements before work begins on government contracts. 

Each of these regulations was created to protect workers in communities from being underbid by outside entities and to help support local small and disadvantaged businesses. 

Risks and Penalties of Labor Compliance Errors

With all of these acts, it can be difficult to ensure accuracy, accountability, and record-keeping all align with local, state, and federal requirements. In the event of an error, there can be significant penalties: 

  • For agencies: Oversight failure can lead to audit scrutiny, project delays, and even the loss of critical funding.
  • For contractors: Misclassifications, incorrect wage determinations, or improper fringe benefit calculations can result in back wages, heavy civil penalties, and in severe cases, debarment.

Common Prevailing Wage Compliance Mistakes to Avoid

Many compliance issues occur from common and preventable errors such as: 

  1. Job Titles: Don’t rely on internal job titles to determine wage classifications. The controlling factor is always the actual work performed. If an employee wears multiple hats during the week, their hours must be tracked and reported separately for each classification.
  2. Fringe Benefit Confusion: Statutory costs (like Social Security or Workers’ Comp) do not count as bona fide fringe benefits. To qualify, benefits must be irrevocable, regular (at least quarterly), enforceable in writing, and properly annualized.
  3. The Misclassification of Independent Contractors: Paying someone via a 1099 does not automatically exempt them from prevailing wage requirements. If they are effectively under your control and using your equipment, they may be considered an employee for the purposes of the project. Always perform a rigorous analysis before assuming exemption.

Benefits of Automated Labor Compliance Software

As regulatory bodies tighten enforcement, manual spreadsheets and siloed data are no longer enough to protect against audits and compliance issues. Centralized, electronic solutions built specifically for handling the complexities of prevailing wage laws help with: 

  • Automation: Tools that automatically cross-reference daily logs, field interviews, and payroll data catch discrepancies before they become audit findings.
  • Integration: Data silos are eliminated when those working on these projects have a contract management system that integrates with a labor compliance system. 
  • Transparency: Modern reporting—like electronic CPR submissions—isn’t just a requirement; it’s a way to prove diligence to agencies and auditors alike.

Proactive Compliance and On-Demand Resources

The best approach to compliance is proactive, not reactive. From apprentice registrations to complex fringe benefit calculations to navigating the differences between federal and state mandates, having the right support makes all the difference.

Ask the Experts: Everything You Need to Know About Prevailing Wage – Watch the On-Demand Webinar Here to hear practical, real-world advice from prevailing wage experts and gain the confidence to manage your compliance program effectively. We covered everything from audit preparation and the latest electronic reporting requirements to navigating joint and several liability.

Expert Insights: Building a Defensible and Scalable SBE Program

As public agencies and organizations balance the need for inclusivity with the need for legal defensibility, the landscape for small business enterprises (SBEs) working on government projects is becoming more complex.

B2Gnow recently sat down with industry expert John Chapman to explore the current state of the SBE environment. Chapman is a Solutions Architect with B2Gnow and has worked with a wide array of organizations such as state DOTs, cities, counties, universities, and health systems to help them optimize their use of software to enhance their diverse supplier certification and compliance programs.

Before joining B2Gnow, Chapman led agency accountability for the New York City M/WBE program.

Find out what Chapman shared regarding SBE certification, program success, and best practices for agencies looking to provide genuine value to the small business community with resilient, scalable SBE programs in the interview below. 

What defines a Small Business Enterprise (SBE) in the U.S.?

Definitions for what a locality defines as an SBE vary significantly because most can choose to set their own thresholds for what constitutes an SBE. 

The Small Business Administration (SBA) offers a guide for small businesses looking to work on government contracts, but diverse business enterprises or DBEs use a more narrow standard of a definition for SBE. To put it more simply, 99% of DBEs are small businesses, but not every entity decides to be certified as an SBE.

Generally, these definitions are based on employee counts – such as 125 employees or fewer – or industry-specific North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes. These codes are used by businesses and government agencies to classify companies by their primary economic activity. 

Localities often adjust these standards to align with their specific economic goals and the size of businesses they aim to support. The SBE standard for NYC will be different from a smaller city because of the size and needs of the locality. 

What should be considered when thinking about becoming a certified Small Business Enterprise (SBE) in the U.S.? 

If you own and operate a small business and are thinking of getting into the government procurement space, there are some important considerations as you evaluate public-sector agencies.

First, find out which agencies, authorities, or other types of public entities buy the goods or services you provide. Most public entities are required to post solicitations and awards online, so it’s easy to find out. 

Second, determine if your firm’s capacity aligns with the agencies’ demand. For example if you’re a landscape architect and your local department of parks and recreation typically awards contracts to landscape architects in the $3 to $5 million range, ensure you can deliver your services at that level. This includes important considerations like bonding and insurance requirements. 

Also try and determine if the goods or services you sell are needed by your local public entities, but typically obtained through subcontractors working under larger prime contractors. 

Subcontracting can be a great way to get your foot in the door because the requirements are not as onerous and you can gain valuable experience. 

Finally, most local public entities will also offer small or micro purchases, which are sometimes targeted opportunities for small businesses. Goods and services procured through these methods generally require less competition and are solicited at smaller volumes, thereby making them easier to execute. Typically, these small or micro purchases require lower insurance requirements as well. 

What should cities, counties, states and other public-sector entities consider when thinking about establishing a Small Business Enterprise (SBE) program? 

In my experience there are some important areas to consider first, especially surrounding perceived value and feedback loops. These two areas are always going to be a part of determining a program’s success. 

You need enough firms to believe the program offers a big enough benefit to justify the level of effort it takes to apply, obtain, and maintain SBE certification. 

Ironically, while many municipalities and elected officials want a large number of certified firms so they can tout that as one success metric, individual SBEs on average will see a smaller slice of the pie as the number of SBEs grows. 

Alternatively, if benefits from an SBE program are concentrated among a small number of firms, it can create a negative feedback loop where the community perceives the program as biased for the few and not worth it for them because they are not seeing widespread benefits. 

With this negative feedback, small businesses may factor this into their decision to not pursue certification. If enough firms don’t seek certification in your SBE program, agency buyers won’t be able to find qualified businesses to include in solicitations for the goods and services they need.  

You can think about it like this, if New York City wants to start a small business program, why would businesses want to get certified? As a vendor, getting certified ties back to the benefits offered through the program. Every sector from private to public offers some level of incentive for small businesses such as lower-priced loans/programs or access to bonding or assistance. 

A program has to have perceived value because you share a lot of personal information to get certified – such as your personal taxes – and you want to trust that information won’t get lost or into the wrong hands. There are lots of programs reserved for small and local businesses, but they only perform as well as their quality and perceived value. 

Then there is the angle of the community’s perception of the program. If the community hears X amount of dollars were awarded to small businesses, but they only ever hear about 10 businesses that received the funds, then that will create a feedback loop saying there is not enough value, and businesses won’t look to get certified as an SBE. 

That is all from the vendor’s standpoint. From a locality’s perspective, they might not want to start a DBE program due to the federal government’s current positioning on diversity, equity, and inclusion. So, they might dissolve or elect not to have DBE programs to avoid attracting attention from the federal government. 

These same localities might instead welcome SBE programs because they are more legally defensible than a DBE or minority or woman-owned business (M/WBE) program because they face less scrutiny. 

In addition, because approximately 99% of businesses qualify as small, these programs may not significantly decrease competitiveness for specific community members, as they are still competing against the vast majority of the market. 

Finally, public contracting requires higher standards—such as specific insurance, bonding, and scale—that differ from private sector work. The amount of paper work and documentation required just to submit a bid, let alone win and get a contract registered or successfully perform on a contract is substantial, so the benefits of the program have to outweigh all of the disincentive to seeking public-sector opportunities. 

Why should a business seek SBE certification?

For a business owner, benefits through the program may include access to capital, preferred rates on short-term loans, assistance obtaining bonding, bidding assistance and other capacity building programs like mentor programs, price preferences, and set-aside bids are great incentives. 

However, the decision to certify relies on a cost-benefit analysis. A business must weigh the effort of sharing sensitive information—like personal and business taxes—against the actual value and substance the program provides to the community.

A business owner also needs to realize the government hires small businesses, but doesn’t operate like a small business. So, it’s important for a small business to know if they can scale to provide not only what the government contract asks for, but if they can provide, say, 10,000 of what the government asks for and if they can do so as fast as a large business. 

Public contracting in general is not for the faint of heart. But to be a certified SBE, it shows a willingness to go through the steps needed to prove you’re willing to go through what it takes, have the ability to scale to the project at hand, and meet the requirements. 

If your business can show gross receipts and averages from a period of three to five years, establish it is small, and provide a personal net worth (PNW) statement highlighting that as the business owner you are not wealthy, then you can be on your way to SBE certification. 

What are the standard requirements for SBE certification?

SBE program requirements vary by municipality, but they often include business size, personal finances, location, and verification. 

For the business size, programs may look at average gross receipts over a specified period or use other size standards. Some programs require a PNW statement to ensure the owner is not what that municipality considers “wealthy” (although typically the net worth of the home is not included in the PNW). 

Many localities require the business to be headquartered within their specific city, county, or state. Lastly, business owners need to prove the applicant legitimately owns, operates, and controls the business. 

Prime contractors and subcontractors have to be careful to not be perceived as helping too much with the SBE because it can get the business in trouble by looking like the owner isn’t operating his or her own company. These programs often have individuals looking out for levels of corruption, so it’s good to be aware of how something can be perceived. 

How can public agencies build resilient and scalable SBE programs?

Resilient and scalable SBE programs need to show their value and the best way to do that is to decentralize operations across multiple agencies like tentacles – the longer the roots or tentacles, the stronger the program. 

If it only lives in the small business agency or economic development or diversity space, it can die if funding is moved or leadership changes. When possible, legislation that defines and requires SBE programs also helps ensure it cannot easily be removed or changed with new administrations.

It’s important to keep strong documentation around processes, rules, and procedures – and then making sure that your organization uses the documentation. Should you ever face an audit, you will be prepared with the information necessary. 

It’s vital to make sure you use the resources you have and avoid single points of failure. Having redundancy in multiple places helps ensure that should someone with a lot of institutional knowledge leave, there are teams and cross training that have occurred, so business can continue to run as usual. 

You want the SBE program to be involved with project managers, accounts payable, and spread across multiple agencies because then it is decentralized and a part of all operations. That gets additional individuals in the locality to be involved in the program, rely on the program, and see the value of the program, which helps solidify its continuation. 

From the vendor community angle, you want to also ensure community advocacy groups and different folks are advocating for the program to show its value for different parts of the community. It helps if different parts of the community come together and provide input while also helping increase engagement and involvement from different sectors. When you do this, the SBE becomes a trusted voice in the business community. 

Ultimately, if you don’t have results it doesn’t matter how much advocacy you have – the program will die or be deemed not real. So it needs to be enforced, you need people to see and experience its value, and you need to have structure. 

For instance, enforcement can mean having something as simple as procurement statistics to show that the SBE is only soliciting certain types of businesses, what the responses were to the solicitation,  and why a bid was won or lost. When you track information and provide an analysis of what the SBE is doing and what value it’s bringing, you will understand areas of success and areas of concern. 

When you think of resiliency and strength, you need to be tracking. You can’t do analysis if you aren’t getting results and a lack of results will get your program terminated. Clearly define what compliance means for your SBE and track every element of data pertaining to that definition. That way, you can have the data to tell folk how your business is doing when you say it’s compliant. 

Why are SBE programs considered more legally defensible than DBE, MBE, or WBE programs?

In the event you have to justify an SBE program in court, it’s often easier because they operate under a lower level of legal scrutiny. Unlike programs designed specifically for protected classes such as MWBEs, SBE certification does not require business owners to prove past discrimination in the marketplace. 

What role does technology and AI play in the SBE certification process?

AI is currently in the conceptual stage for these types of programs. The hope is that it will eventually assist in processing applications by synthesizing documentation, identifying inconsistencies, and presenting salient information to human reviewers. 

However, agencies are still evaluating whether AI can discern the complexities of certification without becoming cost-prohibitive or losing necessary human oversight.

What we are hoping to see within the certification process is how AI can be used for receipt, review, and decision-making on vendor applications, but keeping humans involved for the final say in the ultimate decision. 

Different organizations have different views of how they want to utilize AI and some don’t want to use it at all. With it being in a conceptual phase at this point, there are a lot of layers of understanding to be considered and questions to be answered about how it can be incorporated into processes to do the level of discernment required. 

What is the best way to maintain data integrity and security for vendor directories?

This is a delicate balance and challenges many public agencies and organizations face. It’s important for agencies and organizations to make sure the partners they work with understand the necessary precautions to take for data integrity and security. 

Publicly available directories provide significant value, but this accessibility makes them targets for phishing and scams. Agencies must manage security by working closely with technology partners to understand exposure risks and implement precautions for sensitive vendor data. 

What are the pillars of success for agencies successfully running SBE programs?

Any SBE program is going to need to define compliance and the goals of the program. Business owners will want to engage with the community because you should show that you are there to serve and collaborate within the community. 

There are a lot of good minds in a community and while community members might have different thoughts on what they want to happen, it’s great to come together and share thoughts on what you can achieve together. 

It’s also important to have strong metrics you can work with and understand because ultimately the metrics are going to show how you are achieving your goals. 

If things are going well – or not going well – the metrics are there to help you make necessary changes or adjustments. You also want solid metrics you can share to achieve buy-in, keep engagement, provide feedback, and create a program that continues to evolve and provide value whether it’s year one or year five. 

Moving Forward 

A resilient SBE program requires a foundation of data-driven metrics to track compliance and success along with a commitment to fostering transparent, collaborative relationships with vendors. 

To thrive in today’s environment, building a resilient SBE program requires a foundation of data-driven metrics to track compliance and success, as well as a commitment to fostering transparent, collaborative relationships with vendors. 

By integrating these programs across agency operations and maintaining strong community engagement, organizations can ensure their SBE initiatives evolve into trusted, impactful pillars of local economic success.

*The material provided herein was last updated on 9/10/2026. The information stated is not intended to provide legal advice, but rather, for general informational purposes only.

To learn more, explore B2Gnow’s Vendor Management solution.

Leveraging Power Analytics for Transparency and Program Integrity

Federal, state, and municipal agencies face numerous mandatory reporting requirements related to compliance needs. These reporting requirements generate massive amounts of data that can be difficult to put into easy-to-read reports — especially when using outdated spreadsheets. ٖٖ

However, when agencies have tools to manage, track, and use data (without needing a technical background) they can make faster, more transparent, and more accountable decisions. 

That’s where B2Gnow’s Power Analytics comes in. 

How to Harness Data for Advanced Reportingng

To monitor program progress/performance, boost compliance and stay ready with defensible data for audits, internal reviews, stakeholder visibility, and regulatory requirements, B2Gnow’s Power Analytics makes it possible to generate actionable insights with near real-time information. 

Unlike spreadsheets, Power Analytics provides agencies and organizations with advanced reporting and dashboard capabilities giving the transparency, consistency, and control needed for compliance. 

With Power Analytics and its real-time data capabilities, compliance officers can:

  • Detect issues early
  • Document decisions confidently
  • Demonstrate program integrity with confidence 
  • Analyze program data easily
    Sharing Data for Powerful Storytelling

    Power Analytics’ flexible dashboards and visualizations support audits, investigations, and regular reporting cycles, so compliance officers and other users can bring heightened transparency and visibility across organizations. 

    In addition, Power Analytics provides:

    • Unlimited read-only licenses to ensure program transparency across departments. 
    • A reporting solution that meets evolving compliance needs, and adapts for internal controls, diversity reporting, etc. 
    • Reports that are easily distributed and accessed by compliance, legal, and executive teams allowing for all stakeholders to access the same data for consistent decision-making. 
    • A way to preserve audit trails and version control for designated report creators to securely update and distribute new reports as regulatory demands change.
    • Different charts and graphs to help visualize and compare programs month to month, year over year, etc. – to help monitor program activities and stay on track with goals. 

    View all payment details and awards by goal types with ease with Power Analytics.

      Moving Forward With Defensible Data and Decisions

      Ultimately, those using B2Gnow’s Power Analytics can track their program performance and make informed, defensible decisions using trusted data sources presented in a format that moves away from spreadsheets and supports documentation and compliance readiness. 

      Ready to learn more? Watch this webinar.

      *Microsoft and Power BI are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies

      Modernize Government Reporting and Make Data-Driven Decisions with B2Gnow’s Power Analytics

      Reliance on spreadsheets to track and analyze data is a common bottleneck in the government space. 

      Public agencies generate large amounts of data and are required to keep meticulous records for reporting requirements. Yet many struggle to use the data available – especially when it’s only available on spreadsheets. 

      To ensure these agencies reflect the true impact of all programs running, it’s necessary to move toward a tool capable of taking data and generating actionable insights. 

      That’s why many public agencies and organizations are using Power Analytics from B2Gnow. 

      Moving Away from Spreadsheets and to the Future of Reporting

      With traditional spreadsheets and the manual effort it takes to keep these up-to-date, the resulting data is often fragmented, making it difficult to prove program success and prepare for audits. 

      Because stakeholders need to see the outcomes of a program’s success, data that is outdated, hard to access, read, and visualize means the transparency necessary for decision making often isn’t there. This lack of transparency results in delays that can impact those working on community projects. 

      To further complicate data access and visualization, each individual contributing to spreadsheets increases the chances of missing or deleting data, making errors, and impacting version control. 

      However, with Power Analytics from B2Gnow, government agencies have a tool that helps measure what matters and visually display data, so all stakeholders have a strategic asset to:

      • View and comprehend using prebuilt standard datasets with five bundled reports – without relying on IT
      • Tailor reports to specific needs such as highlighting agency-specific compliance and diversity goals
      • Make data-driven decisions

      In addition, B2Gnow’s Power Analytics:

      With Power Analytics, view all payment details and awards by goal types with ease.

      • Offers immediate value out-of-the-box and serves as a foundation for custom reports
      • Extends the reporting capabilities of the B2Gnow platform to cover the widest range of reporting needs
      • Provides comprehensive ad-hoc, dashboard, and data visualization capabilities in ways stakeholders will understand
      • Deploys and scales easily with unlimited viewer (read-only) licenses
      • Enables collaboration as reports can be shared across the organization so stakeholders can make the best decisions
      • Allows reports to be bundled and tailored for agency-specific needs
      Prioritize Performance, Clarity, and Ease of Use with Power Analytics

      Power Analytics comes with bundled, pre-built reports, including B2Gnow’s Contract Compliance Audit Summaries and Subcontractor Overview Dashboards, so users can instantly feel confident in telling accurate, data-driven stories from day one. 

      In addition, data fields within Power Analytics align with field names used within the B2Gnow interface, allowing users familiar with B2Gnow to use Power Analytics with ease – even from day one.  

      Sharing data is also easy. 

      B2Gnow’s Power Analytics has a free licensing model that includes one creator license with unlimited read-only views, allowing for reports to be shared internally across departments and publicly without restrictions. 

      With this functionality, real-time reports of economic growth and opportunity, program performance, and goals are easily shared with key stakeholders. 

      In addition, viewers don’t even need to log in to view reports – it is as simple as accessing a URL. 

      Plus, data is refreshed nightly, providing the most up-to-date performance snapshots allowing users to identify issues early, document decisions confidently, and demonstrate program integrity.

      With Power Analytics, view all payment details and awards by goal types with ease.

      Let Data Tell the Story of a Program’s Success

      The story of any program’s impact is held in the data an agency keeps, so don’t let it get lost in spreadsheets. 

      Power Analytics ensures the narrative around all programs is unlocked, interactive, tailored, and full of pre-built insights. 

      With B2Gnow’s Power Analytics, agencies experience the power of reporting designed to meet agency-specific compliance and diversity goals to start making informed, confident decisions organizations need and deserve.

      Ready to learn more? Watch this webinar.

      DBE Certification at Scale: DDOT’s Approach to the USDOT’s Interim Final Rule

      Managing disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) certifications can be complex, but not when agencies use the right tools.  

      Stephanie Jenkins, business relationship specialist for the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) in Washington, D.C., focuses on certification for the transportation infrastructure businesses within the city’s eight wards along with her skilled colleagues. 

      DDOT is part of a unified program with the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit (WMATA), which makes up the District of Columbia Unified Certification program (DCUCP). 

      In addition, DDOT is responsible for:

      • 1,100 miles of streets
      • 241 bridges
      • 1,600 miles of sidewalks
      • 453 miles of alleys
      • 144,000 trees adjacent to city streets
      How DDOT is Moving Forward with DBE Certification

      However, with recent changes brought forth by the US Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (USDOT IFR) in late 2025, certification efforts for businesses operating on DDOT’s projects faced a new challenge.  

      “The IFR ruling requires firms to submit a personal narrative as a part of their re-evaluation process to maintain DBE certification,” Jenkins said. “Many of these firms find the personal narrative to be quite challenging.”

      The personal narrative portion of IFR requires a written statement from each business owner currently certified as a DBE to describe specific, individualized barriers faced in education, employment, or business, and how those obstacles demonstrate social and economic disadvantage resulting in measurable economic harm. With the personal narrative requirements, race and gender are no longer presumed indicators of disadvantage, which is a significant change for DBEs. 

      Per the IFR, firms must submit a Personal Narrative and a Personal Net Worth statement to be recertified as DBEs by DDOT. Without these submissions, DBE goals will not be met until the recertification process is complete. DDOT has prioritized recertification for home-state businesses that are currently active on a contract. 

      “DDOT currently certifies 481 home state firms and more than 1,351 interstate firms,” Jenkins said. “To make the recertification process easier, I’ve been able to run reports within B2Gnow to filter out which firms are our home state firms and which are interstate firms. B2Gnow has helped quite a bit with prioritizing our home state firms for recertification.”

      Making the DBE Recertification Process Easier with B2Gnow

      Jenkins said the strategic filtering available in B2Gnow’s certification module helps ensure DDOT works on the recertification process without needing to recertify the entirety of its DBE directory.

      “Without this module, the recertification process could take months,” Jenkins said. “But the system is able to track all mandatory documents needed to complete a single application. A lot of states have not even begun the process of reevaluating because they lack information, but B2Gnow helps us provide them with information they need to complete their applications.”

      Click here to listen as DDOT discusses the benefits of recertification using B2Gnow.

      Next Steps for IFR Compliance

      Program operations and performance metrics are two of the heaviest hit areas for all agencies navigating the 2025 USDOT Internal Final Rule (IFR). 

      The reason for this surrounds the operational challenges requiring mandatory re-evaluation of every certified firm based on individual circumstances rather than demographics alone combined with the temporary pause on counting utilization and setting new goals. 

      While the scale of these changes is substantial, they are entirely manageable with the right structure in place. Agencies need to establish consistent workflows, centralize records, and leverage technology for documentation, communication, and decision tracking, to move forward with confidence.

      The result of this strategic approach is a program that is more efficient, transparent, and defensible, positioning the agency for long-term success under the IFR, supporting staff, and withstanding audits.

      6 Steps to IFR Readiness

      To implement and maintain compliance efficiently, program leaders must focus on the following key steps:

      • Process assessment: Map current workflows and test new procedures on a small scale before a full rollout.
      • Communication: Clearly and consistently inform both staff and vendor firms about IFR requirements and status changes.
      • Goal management: Temporarily suspend goal counting and setting; restore credit immediately upon successful re-evaluation.
      • Re-evaluation: Assess all certified firms with individualized Social and Economic Disadvantage (SED) determinations; standardize review criteria.
      • Documentation: Ensure all documents are complete, log every determination with rationale, and store records centrally for easy retrieval during audits.
      • Record history: Regardless of the system used to manage contract compliance and goal tracking, it’s essential to maintain a complete, accurate record of firms’ certification history and contract performance data for compliance.

      For agencies looking to simplify these processes and maintain complete, verifiable records, B2Gnow provides tools to track firm status, manage utilization, automate notifications, and centralize documentation.

      Ready to learn more? Download this checklist.

      Why Transparency is Your Best IFR Compliance Tool

      Communication is vital when it comes to the 2025 USDOT Interim Final Rule (IFR). 

      With all the process changes necessary for the IFR, agencies need a proactive strategy for change management centered on communication. 

      While creating a communication plan can seem daunting, it’s imperative for DBE compliance managers and program leaders to navigate mandatory re-evaluations and new compliance standards with consistent, clear communication. 

      This communication plan is a key step in reducing errors and maintaining compliance with staff and vendors while also keeping key players informed and engaged.

      5 Key Communication Tasks for Action

      To maximize participation and minimize confusion during this transition, program leaders should focus on five key communication tasks:

      • Inform staff first: Staff need to be aligned and working toward the same objective. A communication plan that details IFR requirements, process changes, what’s needed from each role, and what can be expected is important. 
      • Send multiple notifications to firms: Transparency and repeated outreach maximize participation. Firms need multiple notifications about requirements and what to expect. Outreach campaigns that send automated reminders, and pending re-evaluation applications automatically notify firms until completed. Staff-generated decision letters can also be sent, saved, and shared within a vendor management system. 
      • Provide accessible guidance materials: Centralized guidance materials support clarity and compliance. Training videos and live training sessions assist in educating all involved in IFR changes.
      • Set up ongoing updates: Real-time visibility is critical to keeping everyone informed. With a vendor management system that provides dashboards, DBE compliance managers receive real-time visibility and notifications for ongoing updates.
      • Maintain transparency during audits: A logged history of communications reduces audit risk. All actions should be logged for audit trails, ensuring transparency and accountability.
      The Power of Automation in Outreach  

      When relying on manual communication, follow-ups consume significant staff time and often lead to overlooked steps. However, with a built-in communication outreach program, DBE program leaders can expect: 

      • Reduced errors and rework
      • Increased participation and compliance
      • Strengthened transparency and audit readiness

      Ready to learn how other agencies are aligning with IFR? Watch now.

      Achieving Audit-Ready Documentation for IFR Compliance

      Disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) compliance managers are experiencing an urgent focus on accountability and compliance as they work to ensure all elements of the 2025 USDOT Interim Final Rule (IFR) are put into place. 

      For a defensible program, compliance managers need to focus on clear, verifiable documentation that meets the needs and expectations of auditors. 

      To do this, records need to show a complete and auditable history of every element of a program, including clear, verifiable records that show how decisions were made, what communications occurred, and how any changes to goal credit or firm status were handled. 

      Maintaining this level of detail supports compliance, reduces confusion, demonstrates due diligence, and is what ultimately protects agencies during an audit. This method also ensures that all decisions can be explained in the future because of proper documentation.

      5 Tasks for Audit Readiness

      Achieving true audit readiness requires five key tasks, all centered on centralizing data and automatically tracking actions.

      • Centralize all records: To speed up retrieval during an audit, all documents must be instantly searchable. Agencies need a searchable, centralized document repository, which stores all certification-related data, including staff reviews, final decisions, and firm communications.
      • Track goal credit changes accurately: Tracking goal credit changes accurately prevents reporting errors and limits confusion within the vendor community. 
      • Log communications and follow-ups: Demonstrate due diligence by logging all communications and follow ups.  
      • Ensure payment records are complete: Accessible and complete payment records support audit verification. DBE program managers need to ensure payments, verification, and prompt pay elements are stored in one easy-to-access location.
      • Confirm current certification records: Agencies must confirm all certification-related records are current and documented to ensure compliance and readiness.

      The true value of this comprehensive approach is proven when the audit begins. 

      With a central document repository, all files are searchable and retrievable, which helps reduce review time and minimizes risk during the auditing process. 

      Listen as officials with the state of Oregon discuss successes with the IFR requirements in this on-demand webinar. Watch now.

      The IFR Mandate: Why Pausing Goal Credit is Only Half the Battle

      One of the most impactful and challenging rules for agencies adhering to the 2025 USDOT Interim Final Rule (IFR) surrounds the temporary suspension of goal credit for certified firms on all contracts. 

      While the pause on goal credit is temporary, it is imperative for agencies to continue documenting a record of each firm’s eligibility and utilization history. That means reporting for goal credit still needs to happen as it is critical for fairness, compliance, and audit protection. 

      To navigate this mandatory suspension successfully, program leaders need to focus on establishing robust data integrity practices that ensure a complete audit trail and seamless restoration of eligibility.

      The Dual Challenge: Suspend Counting, Maintain Tracking for IFR

      Agencies face a dual mandate: they must stop counting goal credit, but they cannot stop the essential work of contract management. This requires a strategic approach:

      • Continue Payment Tracking: Throughout the re-evaluation period, agencies must continue tracking payments to support prompt pay requirements and ensure consistency for primes and subs. This data collection must continue even while utilization counting is paused, ensuring all necessary history is available when the suspension lifts.
      • Real-Time Status Updates: Agencies must diligently track and update firm status—pending, re-evaluated, or decertified—to maintain accurate reporting.
      Keep History at the Forefront: Make Updates, Don’t Delete Records

      One of the biggest risks during this transitional phase is data loss or fragmentation. That’s why it is important for agencies to update and categorize vendor records without deleting these items.  

      Maintaining a complete vendor history is essential for distinguishing between data used for internal tracking versus data used for external reporting. This distinction avoids misreporting, facilitates undoing mistakes, and maintains an unbroken historical record. 

      Recording all goal and eligibility changes provides a crucial audit trail, making it easy to see all changes, who made them, and when.

      Easy Goal Restoration for Audit Readiness

      When a firm successfully completes its mandatory re-evaluation, agencies need to be prepared to restore eligibility instantly. To do this, consistent tracking of firm status ensures correct goal reporting resumes from the moment eligibility is restored.

      Remember, the IFR goal credit suspension is a temporary state, but the integrity of an agency’s program history is permanent. Consistent tracking of goal credit and firm status prevents misreporting and confusion later. 

      Meticulous tracking and centralized records ensure accurate reporting and IFR compliance, transforming a complex mandate into a defensible, auditable process.

      Need more guidance? Download the IFR Readiness Guide now..